Subregulatory Guidance Tracker

Federal agencies sometimes create policies or alter regulations without submitting these changes to a formal review process as required by federal law. They do so by claiming these policies are simply clarifications of existing law, and issue them in the form of “Dear Colleague” letters, bulletins, memos, circulars, examples, etc., which together are often referred to as “guidance.”

More than 100,000 pieces of guidance exist, but most are not easily found online.

In this tracker, you will find summaries of suspect guidance, with links to their text and related information. Criteria for listing guidance is available here. If you are aware of guidance not listed here that you believe might be illegal rulemaking, please contact us.

You can search for guidance updates by agency using the drop down below or by keyword using the search function.

Have you seen guidance issued that others should be aware of? Share the details via our Guidance Spotting form.

Racial Discrimination in School Discipline

Racial Discrimination in School Discipline

The Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights and the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division jointly released a resource document that highlights recent investigations of school discipline policies. This document features various investigations of discrimination in student discipline on the basis of race, color, or national origin under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Departments’ Title VI regulations.

Read More
Supporting Disabled Students
Department of Education Tenille Martin Department of Education Tenille Martin

Supporting Disabled Students

The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) issued guidance on the rights of public-school students with disabilities, including behavioral disabilities, at the elementary and secondary education level, to nondiscrimination on the basis of disability, under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, in the context of discipline.

Read More
Application of Bostock v. Clayton County to Program Discrimination Complaints

Application of Bostock v. Clayton County to Program Discrimination Complaints

In light of Bostock v. Clayton County, the Food and Nutrition Service within the Department of Agriculture (USDA) determined that discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation can constitute prohibited sex discrimination under Title IX and the Food and Nutrition Act.

Read More